The case concerns the alleged desecration of a monument commemorating Jewish historical heritage. Although the prosecution argued that the defendant’s conduct amounted to insulting a monument associated with Jewish memory, the court found no evidence of antisemitic intent or hostility towards Jews, holding that the act constituted public indecency rather than a criminal insult to the monument.
Art. 261, Art. 57a § 1 Criminal Code
Art. 140 Code of Petty Offences
Art. 4, Art. 7, Art. 410, Art. 425 § 1–2, Art. 427 § 1–2, Art. 437 § 1–2, Art. 438(2), Art. 454 § 1, Art. 636 § 1 Code of Criminal Procedure
Art. 119 Code of Procedure in Petty Offence Cases.
Art. 140 Code of Petty Offences