The case concerns acquisitive prescription of property in Łódź formerly owned by a Jewish family who fled persecution during World War II, where the heirs argued that antisemitism in post war Poland prevented them from reclaiming the property; the court acknowledged the historical reality of antisemitism, including the 1968 anti Jewish campaign, but held that it did not amount to an objective impossibility of pursuing legal claims, emphasising that general discrimination or fear is insufficient to suspend prescription without concrete evidence, and ultimately confirmed that ownership was acquired by the State Treasury.
Art. 172 §1–§2, Art. 336, Art. 339, Art. 140, Art. 7, Art. 6, Art. 121 pkt 4, Art. 175 Civil Code
Art. 233 §1, Art. 328 §2, Art. 228 §2, Art. 386 §1, Art. 385, Art. 520 §1, Art. 13 §2 Code of Civil Procedure