The case includes antisemitic language used by the applicant in her pleadings. The court deliberately omitted reproducing the offensive, obscene, and antisemitic statements, finding them irrelevant to the legal issues, and resolved the case solely on the basis of the applicable property tax provisions.
Article 3(1)(4)(a), Article 1a, and Articles 2–6 of the Act of 12 January 1991 on Local Taxes and Charges
Article 336 Civil Code
Article 151 Law on Proceedings Before Administrative Courts
Article 21 of the Geodetic and Cartographic Law
Article 43 of the Real Estate Management Act
the provisions of the Tax Ordinance concerning tax proceedings and the invalidity of decisions, in particular Articles 187(3), 210(4), and 247(1)