Previous 1 / 15 Next

,,26.=DVDG\X]QDQLDSRGPLRWRZRĞFL]ZLą]NXZ\]QDQLRZHJRRUD]]DNUHVVWRVRZDQLDXVWDZ\RVWRVXQNX SDĔVWZDGRJPLQZ\]QDQLRZ\FKĪ\GRZVNLFKZNRQWHNĞFLHUHMHVWUDFMLQRZ\FK]ZLą]NyZUHOLJLMQ\FKLLFKXSUDZQLHĔ :\URN1DF]HOQHJR6ąGX$GPLQLVWUDF\MQHJR /(;QU :\URN 1DF]HOQHJR6ąGX$GPLQLVWUDF\MQHJR ]GQLDSDĨG]LHUQLNDU ,,26. 8=$6$'1,(1,( 6NáDGRU]HNDMąF\ 3U]HZRGQLF]ąF\ 6ĊG]LRZLH16$ 6HQWHQFMD 1DF]HOQ\6ąG$GPLQLVWUDF\MQ\SRUR]SR]QDQLXZGQLXSDĨG]LHUQLNDUQDUR]SUDZLHZ,]ELH 2JyOQRDGPLQLVWUDF\MQHMVSUDZ\]HVNDUJLNDVDF\MQHM RGZ\URNX:RMHZyG]NLHJR6ąGX $GPLQLVWUDF\MQHJRZ:DUV]DZLH]GQLDSDĨG]LHUQLNDUV\JQDNW,6$:DZVSUDZLH]H VNDUJL QDGHF\]MĊ0LQLVWUD$GPLQLVWUDFMLL&\IU\]DFML]GQLD OXWHJRUQU ZSU]HGPLRFLH XPRU]HQLDSRVWĊSRZDQLDDGPLQLVWUDF\MQHJR XFK\OD]DVNDUĪRQ\Z\URNLSU]HND]XMHVSUDZĊ:RMHZyG]NLHPX6ąGRZL$GPLQLVWUDF\MQHPXZ :DUV]DZLHGRSRQRZQHJRUR]SR]QDQLD ]DVąG]DRG QDU]HF] NZRWĊ]á VáRZQLHWU]\VWD]áRW\FK W\WXáHP]ZURWXNRV]WyZ SRVWĊSRZDQLDNDVDF\MQHJR 8]DVDGQLHQLHIDNW\F]QH :RMHZyG]NL6ąG$GPLQLVWUDF\MQ\Z:DUV]DZLHZ\URNLHP]SDĨG]LHUQLNDUV\JQDNW,6$:D ZVSUDZLH]HVNDUJL QDGHF\]MĊ0LQLVWUD$GPLQLVWUDFMLL&\IU\]DFML]GQLD OXWHJRUQU ZSU]HGPLRFLHXPRU]HQLDSRVWĊSRZDQLDDGPLQLVWUDF\MQHJRXFK\OLá]DVNDUĪRQąGHF\]MĊRUD]GHF\]MĊ 0LQLVWUD6SUDZ:HZQĊWU]Q\FKL$GPLQLVWUDFML]GQLD OLSFDUQU RUD]VWZLHUG]LáĪH

Select target paragraph3

● ● ●

Naczelny Sąd Administracyjny - 14.10.2014

Case

Case number: II OSK 200/13

Country

Poland

Case Description: Judicial review of state recognition of Jewish religious communities and religious pluralism within Judaism. The case concerned a challenge to the registration of a Jewish religious association outside the statutory framework governing Jewish communities. The Supreme Administrative Court held that Polish law and constitutional guarantees of freedom of religion protect pluralism within Judaism and do not establish a monopoly for a single organisational model. It stressed that restricting Jewish religious life to one statutory structure could amount to indirect discrimination and unjustified interference with religious freedom, and remitted the case for reconsideration.

Art. 1, Art. 2 § 1, Art. 7, Art. 24 Act of 20 February 1997 on the Relationship between the State and Jewish Religious Communities in the Republic of Poland

Art. 1 § 1 and § 2, Art. 2 point 1, Art. 7 § 1, Art. 18 § 1, Art. 30 to Art. 32, Art. 34 § 1 Act of 17 May 1989 on Guarantees of Freedom of Conscience and Religion

Art. 25 § 3, Art. 53 § 1 and § 2 Constitution of the Republic of Poland

Art. 9 § 1 European Convention on Human Rights

Art. 18 Universal Declaration of Human Rights

Art. 28, Art. 138 § 1 point 1 Code of Administrative Procedure

Art. 141 § 4, Art. 145 § 1 point 1(c), Art. 183 § 1, Art. 185 § 1, Art. 203 point 2 Law on Proceedings before Administrative Courts

Name of Court: Naczelny Sąd Administracyjny - Izba Ogólnoadministracyjna

Date of decision: Oct 14, 2014

Subjects

Discrimination
Freedom of Religion

Type of Court

Court of Appeal

Area of Law

Administrative Law

Year

2014

Generated ID: HBV2139-3061

Geolocation

Latitude: 52.23365

Longitude: 21.01339

: Geolocation

Source: Wyrok NSA z 14.10.2014 r., II OSK 200/13, LEX nr 1769946.

PDF: Existing

Link: https://orzeczenia.nsa.gov.pl/doc/5858930B41

Preview

Primary Documents

ii-osk-200-13-wyrok-naczelnego-sadu.pdf
Other
Download View

SATL-Database

Select target paragraph3

Naczelny Sąd Administracyjny - 14.10.2014

Primary Documents

Notifications