Incitement/Boycott (Provocation à la discrimination/ Boycott) – The Court of Appeal justified its decision by stating that the defendant was guilty of inciting to racial hatred and violence – In a speech given by the defendant in a mosque, he accused the Israeli people of moral corruption, citing historical grievances such as the killing of prophets, the falsification of the Torah, and idol worship (the golden calf). He also alleged that Israelis exerted disproportionate control over global political and economic channels.

Art. 24 Loi du 29 juillet 1881 sur la liberté de la presse.