The case concerns refusal to initiate proceedings on restitution of property allegedly affected by post war agrarian reform, where the applicant invoked Holocaust related arguments including the so called Act 447. The court rejected this, holding that such references have no legal relevance in Polish law, and emphasised that claims connected to Jewish property losses must be based on proven legal succession and domestic legal grounds, not on broader historical or political narratives, thereby preventing the misuse of Holocaust related discourse in property disputes.
Art. 61a § 1, Art. 28, Art. 7, Art. 77 § 1, Art. 80, Art. 107 § 3 Code of Administrative Procedure
Art. 151, Art. 134 § 1, Art. 119 point 3, Art. 120 Law on Proceedings before Administrative Courts
Art. 1025 § 2, Art. 1027 Civil Code
Art. 2 Decree of 6 September 1944 on Agrarian Reform