Denial of crimes against humanity, and complicity (contestation de crimes contre l'humanité, et complicité) – The Court of Appeal accurately assessed the meaning and scope of the offending remarks – insofar as the culprit took up the distinction between war crimes and crimes against humanity and considered that only war crimes had been perpetrated against the 'international Jewish nation' – That he thus refused to accept the specificity of the atrocities committed against the Jewish community.

Art. 23, 24 bis, 42, 43 Loi du 29 juillet 1881 sur la liberté de la presse; Art. 593 du Code de procédure pénale.