“Q. What you said to Miss Montgomery was the others were his sister, his wife and his mother, and you said later on Zoran came into the equation? A. Yes, because he talked about Zoran afterwards. Q. When is later on? A. It has to be after I went to Spain. It has to between 1984 and 1986. But I can’t honestly put a month or a time on that at all. Q. Are you suggesting, because I don’t think anybody else has, that [Bane] thought that his son was plotting to harm him? A. That’s what he said. Q. You are saying that he actually said that? A. I knew him. That’s what he said to me. Q. He said that in so many words? A. He said that to me.” I regret that I am unable to accept this evidence, because it appears to be in total conflict with what Mr Brown said earlier in his cross-examination, and repeated in reexamination, to the effect that after his move to Spain in 1983 Bane never mentioned Zoran and never wanted to talk about him at all. Mr Brown gave his oral evidence with expansive self-confidence, but I think that on this occasion he allowed himself to embellish his recollection. I cannot believe that if Bane had ever said to him, in so many words, that Zoran was plotting to harm him, he would not have remembered this and included it in the statement which he gave to Zoran’s solicitors in January of this year. 117. I now move on to the witnesses of fact who gave evidence for the CPA. They were as follows: (a) Peter Evans; (b) Barbara Yerolemou; (c) Wioletta Trojanowska; (d) Ivor Thomas Gabe; (e) Raymond Seeley; (f) General Stuart Watson; (g) Robert Anderson Wood; (h) Archpriest Milun Kostic; and