Sąd Apelacyjny w Gdańsku - 30.03.2017
Case- Case number
- V ACa 786/15
- Country
- Poland
- Case Description
Violation of personal rights (Naruszenie dóbr osobistych) - Concerns whether personal rights were violated by an online publications - The court found that the publications defamed the plaintiff by indirectly comparing his views with racist and antisemitic ideologies and dismissing his work as pseudoscience - The court ruled that public figures must endure more criticism, but certain statements nevertheless violated the plaintiff's personal rights.
Art. 5, Art. 23, Art. 24, Art. 24 § 1, Art. 415, Art. 448 Kodeks cywilny; Art. 100, Art. 233 § 1, Art. 385, Art. 386 § 1 Kodeks postępowania cywilnego; Art. 83 ust. 2, Art. 100 ust. 1, Art. 101 ust. 3, Art. 113 ust. 1 Koszty sądowe w sprawach cywilnych; Art. 6 ust. 1, Art. 12 ust. 1 pkt 1, Art. 38 ust. 1 Prawo prasowe
- Name of Court
- Sąd Apelacyjny w Gdańsku - V Wydział Cywilny
- Date of decision
- Mar 30, 2017
- Subjects
- Freedom of Speech
- General right to personality
- Type of Court
- Court of Appeal
- Area of Law
- Civil Law
- Year
- 2017
- Generated ID
- TWC8731-5889
- Geolocation
Latitude: 54.352025
Longitude: 18.646638
- Geolocation
- Source
- Lex
- Not present